Comparative Analysis of Traditional Excel and AI-Powered Business Intelligence Tools for Manufacturing Cash Flow Forecasting: An Evaluation of Accuracy, Usability, and Cost-Effectiveness

Main Article Content

Liya Ge

Abstract

Manufacturing enterprises face mounting pressure to enhance cash flow forecasting accuracy amid increasingly volatile market conditions. This study presents a systematic comparative evaluation of traditional Excel-based methods against AI-powered business intelligence platforms, specifically Power BI and Tableau, for cash flow forecasting in manufacturing contexts. Through empirical analysis of 18 months of transaction data from a mid-sized manufacturing enterprise processing $750,000 weekly cash flows, the research quantifies performance differences across three critical dimensions: forecasting accuracy, operational usability, and cost-effectiveness. Results demonstrate that AI-enabled tools improve forecast accuracy by up to ~33% (Excel 12.5% → Power BI 8.3%) and ~27% (Tableau 9.1%), as measured by Mean Absolute Percentage Error, reduce ongoing analytical time requirements by 57-66%, and deliver a positive return on investment within 14-16 months despite higher initial implementation costs. The findings establish an evidence-based decision framework for manufacturing financial managers evaluating the adoption of business intelligence tools.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Traditional Excel and AI-Powered Business Intelligence Tools for Manufacturing Cash Flow Forecasting: An Evaluation of Accuracy, Usability, and Cost-Effectiveness. (2026). Journal of Science, Innovation & Social Impact, 2(1), 96-110. https://sagespress.com/index.php/JSISI/article/view/84

References

1. M. Miškuf and I. Zolotová, "Application of business intelligence solutions on manufacturing data," in Proc. IEEE 13th Int. Symp. Appl. Mach. Intell. Informat. (SAMI), Jan. 2015, pp. 193–197.

2. Z. Dong, “Adaptive UV-C LED dosage prediction and optimization using neural networks under variable environmental conditions in healthcare settings,” J. Adv. Comput. Syst., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 47–56, 2024.

3. R. Khandelwal, P. Marfatia, S. Shah, V. Joshi, P. Kamath, and K. Chavan, "Financial Data Time Series Forecasting Using Neural Networks and a Comparative Study," In 2022 International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT), January, 2022, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/iconat53423.2022.9725845

4. S. Roy, S. Polley, S. De, C. Gangwal, and C. Mitra, "Harnessing AI and Machine Learning for Improved Cash Flow Forecasting," 2025.

5. T. ap Ramanei, N. L. Abdullah, and P. T. Khim, "Predicting accounts receivable with machine learning: a case in Malaysia," In 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), July, 2021, pp. 156-161.

6. Y. Cheng, Q. Li, and F. Wan, "Financial risk management using machine learning method," In 2021 3rd international conference on machine learning, big data and business intelligence (MLBDBI), December, 2021, pp. 133-139. doi: 10.1109/mlbdbi54094.2021.00034

7. M. Alsaadi, M. T. Almashhadany, A. S. Obaed, H. B. Furaijl, S. Kamil, and S. R. Ahmed, "AI-Based Predictive Analytics for Financial Risk Management," in Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Multidisciplinary Studies Innov. Technol. (ISMSIT), Nov. 2024, pp. 1–7.

8. M. Alsaadi, M. T. Almashhadany, A. S. Obaed, H. B. Furaijl, S. Kamil, and S. R. Ahmed, "AI-Based Predictive Analytics for Financial Risk Management," In 2024 8th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), November, 2024, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.1109/ismsit63511.2024.10757214

9. F. U. Ojika, O. S. A. Z. E. E. Onaghinor, O. J. Esan, A. I. Daraojimba, and B. C. Ubamadu, "A predictive analytics model for strategic business decision-making: A framework for financial risk minimization and resource optimization," IRE Journals, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 764-766, 2023.

10. E. Fernaldy, and K. Deniswara, "Literature Review on Optimizing Cash Flow Forecasting Using Machine Learning in Small and Medium Enterprises," In 2025 International Conference on Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems (ICMLAS), March, 2025, pp. 323-328. doi: 10.1109/icmlas64557.2025.10968322

11. H. C. RAKIBUL, A. M. ABDULLAH, Z. R. F. MD, and J. ISRAT, "The impact of predictive analytics on financial risk management in businesses," WORLD, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1378-1386, 2024.

12. Z. A. Obaid, and A. S. Shaker, "AI-Powered Predictive Analytics in Financial Forecasting: Implications for Real-Time Reporting Adoption," In 2025 International Conference on Frontier Technologies and Solutions (ICFTS), March, 2025, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1109/icfts62006.2025.11032008

13. E. Alex Avelar, and R. V. D. Jordão, "The role of artificial intelligence in the decision-making process: a study on the financial analysis and movement forecasting of the world's largest stock exchanges," Management decision, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 3533-3556, 2025. doi: 10.1108/md-09-2023-1625

14. M. Katamaneni, P. Agrawal, S. Veera, A. K. Sahoo, K. S. Sidhu, and M. F. Hasan, "AI-Based Risk Management in Financial Services," In 2024 Second International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (IC3TES), November, 2024, pp. 1-5.

15. Z. Dong and R. Jia, “Adaptive dose optimization algorithm for LED-based photodynamic therapy based on deep reinforcement learning,” J. Sustain., Policy, Pract., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 144–155, 2025.

16. M. Z. Hossan, M. B. Riipa, M. A. Hossain, S. R. Dhar, A. M. Zaman, M. Hossain, and H. M. Sozib, "AI-Powered Predictive Analytics for Financial Risk Management in US Markets," EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics, vol. 4, 2025.

17. Z. Dong and F. Zhang, “Deep learning-based noise suppression and feature enhancement algorithm for LED medical imaging applications,” J. Sci., Innov. Soc. Impact, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2025.

18. S. Kiyosov, "Predictive Analytics in Automotive Insurance for Financial Risk Mitigation," In AI's Role in Enhanced Automotive Safety, 2025, pp. 423-436. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-0442-7.ch027