Fairness-Aware Feature Attribution for Credit Scoring: A Causal Path Decomposition Approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. L. T. Liu, S. Dean, E. Rolf, M. Simchowitz, and M. Hardt, "Delayed impact of fair machine learning," In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19), 2019, pp. 6196-6200. doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/862
2. S. A. Friedler, C. Scheidegger, S. Venkatasubramanian, S. Choudhary, E. P. Hamilton, and D. Roth, "A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning," In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT '19), 2019, pp. 329-338. doi: 10.1145/3287560.3287589
3. J. Chen, N. Kallus, X. Mao, G. Svacha, and M. Udell, "Fairness under unawareness: Assessing disparity when protected class is unobserved," In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT '19), 2019, pp. 339-348.
4. B. Hutchinson, and M. Mitchell, "50 years of test (un)fairness: Lessons for machine learning," In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT '19), 2019, pp. 49-58.
5. R. Agarwal, L. Melnick, N. Frosst, X. Zhang, B. Lengerich, R. Caruana, and G. E. Hinton, "Neural additive models: Interpretable machine learning with neural nets," In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021), 2021, pp. 4699-4711.
6. X. Hu, C. Rudin, and M. Seltzer, "Optimal sparse decision trees," In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), 2019, pp. 7265-7273.
7. L. Semenova, C. Rudin, and R. Parr, "On the existence of simpler machine learning models," In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '22), 2022, pp. 1827-1858. doi: 10.1145/3531146.3533232
8. A. H. Karimi, B. Schölkopf, and I. Valera, "Algorithmic recourse: From counterfactual explanations to interventions," In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21), 2021, pp. 353-362.
9. S. Chiappa, "Path-specific counterfactual fairness," In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19), 33(01), 7801-7808., 2019. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017801
10. Y. Wu, L. Zhang, X. Wu, and H. Tong, "PC-Fairness: A unified framework for measuring causality-based fairness," In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), 2019, pp. 3399-3409.
11. H. Nilforoshan, J. D. Gaebler, R. Shroff, and S. Goel, "Causal conceptions of fairness and their consequences," In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2022), PMLR 162, 2022, pp. 16848-16887.
12. E. Black, J. L. Koepke, P. Kim, S. Barocas, and M. Hsu, "Operationalizing the search for less discriminatory alternatives in fair lending," In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24), 2024, pp. 1-15.
13. K. Lam, "A framework for assurance audits of algorithmic systems," In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24)., 2024. doi: 10.1145/3630106.3658957
14. A. Kasirzadeh, and A. Smart, "The use and misuse of counterfactuals of ethical machine learning," In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21), 2021, pp. 228-238.
15. C. Oh, H. Won, J. So, T. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Choi, and K. Song, "Learning fair representation via distributional contrastive disentanglement," In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '22), 2022, pp. 1342-1351.