FTAFO: A Federated Transparent Adaptive Financial Optimizer for Reducing Third-Party Dependencies in Workflow Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
Modern financial institutions face increasing challenges due to opaque third-party AI systems governing critical workflow decisions. After firsthand experience with the limitations of existing solutions during a complex 18-month implementation project, we developed FTAFO (Federated Transparent Adaptive Financial Optimizer), a novel framework that fundamentally rethinks financial workflow optimization by introducing three core innovations: a federated consensus mechanism enabling distributed decision-making without reliance on centralized black-box systems, an adaptive transparency engine providing real-time explanations while maintaining computational efficiency, and a multi-objective optimization algorithm that simultaneously balances performance, interpretability, and regulatory compliance. Extensive testing across five financial institutions demonstrated promising results, with workflow processing times improving by approximately 18-28%, third-party licensing costs reduced by roughly 60-70%, and regulatory audit preparation time decreasing from several weeks to around 2-3 days. Implementation revealed challenges including initial setup complexity and the need for substantial staff retraining. Nevertheless, the framework's open architecture offers a practical alternative to vendor lock-in while meeting stringent regulatory requirements. This work contributes to the growing field of explainable AI in finance, though limitations remain in ultra-high-frequency scenarios and environments with restricted technical infrastructure.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. M. A. Mestikou, K. E. Smeti, and Y. Hachaïchi, "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications," Financial Stability Board, vol. 1, pp. 1-6, 2023.
2. P. Gohel, P. Singh, and M. Mohanty, "Explainable AI: Current status and future directions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07045, 2021.
3. A. S. Ogunmokun, E. D. Balogun, and K. O. Ogunsola, "A conceptual framework for AI-driven financial risk management and corporate governance optimization," International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, vol. 2, 2021. doi: 10.54660/.ijmrge.2021.2.1.772-780
4. A. B. M. Metwally, and A. Diab, "An institutional analysis of the risk management process during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 40-62, 2023. doi: 10.1108/jaoc-03-2021-0043
5. Z. Yang, M. Chen, K. K. Wong, H. V. Poor, and S. Cui, "Federated learning for 6G: Applications, challenges, and opportunities," Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 33-41, 2022.
6. M. S. El-Abbasy, A. Elazouni, and T. Zayed, "Finance-based scheduling multi-objective optimization: Benchmarking of evolutionary algorithms," Automation in Construction, vol. 120, p. 103392, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103392
7. N. Rane, S. Choudhary, and J. Rane, "Blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) integration for revolutionizing security and transparency in finance," SSRN 4644253, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4644253
8. L. Kruse, N. Wunderlich, and R. Beck, "Artificial intelligence for the financial services industry: What challenges organizations to succeed," 2019. doi: 10.24251/hicss.2019.770
9. M. Hernes, and J. Sobieska-Karpińska, "Application of the consensus method in a multiagent financial decision support system," Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 167-185, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10257-015-0280-9
10. L. A. R. Aziz, and Y. Andriansyah, "The role of artificial intelligence in modern banking: An exploration of AI-driven approaches for enhanced fraud prevention, risk management, and regulatory compliance," Reviews of Contemporary Business Analytics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 110-132, 2023.