Coordination Polymer Design for Catalytic Efficiency Enhancement

Main Article Content

Hui Zhang
Feng Wang
Lei Chen

Abstract

Coordination polymers and metal-organic frameworks represent a revolutionary class of porous crystalline materials that have transformed heterogeneous catalysis through their unprecedented structural tunability, high surface areas, and designable active sites. This review examines strategic design approaches for enhancing catalytic efficiency in coordination polymer systems through rational manipulation of framework topology, metal center selection, ligand engineering, and pore environment optimization. The discussion encompasses reticular chemistry principles that guide framework construction, structure-property relationships governing catalytic performance, and emerging strategies including dual-metal site incorporation and programmable logic systems. Recent advances in copper-based coordination polymers demonstrate how auxiliary ligand selection and geometric control enable optimization of catalytic activities ranging from organic transformations to electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction and enzyme inhibition. Through systematic analysis of synthesis methodologies, structural characterization techniques, and catalytic evaluation protocols, this work illustrates fundamental design principles that connect framework architecture to catalytic efficiency. The integration of computational modeling with experimental validation enables predictive catalyst design and accelerates discovery of high-performance systems for industrial applications including wastewater treatment, fine chemical synthesis, and sustainable energy conversion. Understanding coordination polymer design principles provides essential guidance for developing next-generation catalytic materials with enhanced activities, selectivities, and stabilities that address critical challenges in chemical manufacturing and environmental remediation.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Coordination Polymer Design for Catalytic Efficiency Enhancement. (2025). Journal of Science, Innovation & Social Impact, 1(1), 150-161. https://sagespress.com/index.php/JSISI/article/view/22

References

1. Z. Chen, K. O. Kirlikovali, P. Li, and O. K. Farha, “Reticular Chemistry for Highly Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks: The Chemistry and Applications,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 579–591, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00707.

2. J. Kim and W. Choe, “Topology-guided roadmap for reticular chemistry of metal-organic polyhedra,” Chem, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 617–631, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.02.008.

3. A. Saura-Sanmartin, “Photoresponsive Metal-Organic Frameworks as Adjustable Scaffolds in Reticular Chemistry,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 13, p. 7121, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijms23137121.

4. F. Ding, N. Su, C. Ma, B. Li, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, “Fabrication of two novel two-dimensional copper-based coordination polymers regulated by the ‘V’-shaped second auxiliary ligands as high-efficiency urease inhibitors,” Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 170, p. 113319, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113319.

5. H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, “The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks,” Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 341, no. 6149, p. 1230444, 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1230444.

6. Allison Gonçalves Silva, H. Alexandre, José Carlos Souza, José Dantas Neto, Paulo, and Maria João Rochaet al., “The Chemistry and Applications of Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Industrial Enzyme Immobilization Systems,” Molecules, vol. 27, no. 14, p. 4529, 2022, doi: 10.3390/molecules27144529.

7. F. Ding, C. Ma, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, “Second auxiliary ligand induced two coppor-based coordination polymers and urease inhibition activity,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 331, p. 124537, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124537.

8. A. Bavykina, N. Kolobov, I. S. Khan, J. A. Bau, A. Ramirez, and J. Gascon, “Metal–Organic Frameworks in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Recent Progress, New Trends, and Future Perspectives,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 120, no. 16, pp. 8468–8535, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00685.

9. A. Fdez-Sanromán, E. Rosales, M. Pazos, and A. Sanroman, “Metal–Organic Frameworks as Powerful Heterogeneous Catalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 8240, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12168240.

10. K. K. Gangu and S. B. Jonnalagadda, “A Review on Metal-Organic Frameworks as Congenial Heterogeneous Catalysts for Potential Organic Transformations,” Frontiers in Chemistry, vol. 9, p.747615, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.747615.

11. G. Xie, W. Guo, Z. Fang, Z. Duan, X. Lang, and D. Liu et al., “Dual‐metal sites drive tandem electrocatalytic CO2 to C2+ products,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 136, no. 47, p. e202412568, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ange.202412568.

12. Y. Shen, T. Pan, L. Wang, Z. Ren, W. Zhang, and F. Huo, “Programmable Logic in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Catalysis,” Advanced Materials, vol. 33, no. 46, p. 2007442, 2021, doi: 10.1002/adma.202007442.

13. J. Lin, J. Ouyang, T. Liu, F. Li, H. H.-Y. Sung, and I. Williams et al., “Metal-organic framework boosts heterogeneous electron donor–acceptor catalysis,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p.7757, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43577-5.

14. H. Fu, H. Ma, and S. Zhao, “Structural Control of Copper-Based MOF Catalysts for Electroreduction of CO2: A Review,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2205, 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr12102205.

15. M. Cheng, X. Zheng, F. Ma, Z. Zhu, and Q. Xu, “Structural Engineering of Metal‐Organic Frameworks for Efficient CO2 Reduction Reaction,” ChemCatChem, vol. 16, no. 17, p.e202400438, 2024, doi: 10.1002/cctc.202400438.