Inorganic Communication Networks through Two-Dimensional Coordination Polymers: Environmental and Biological Applications
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable agricultural practices has intensified research into enzyme inhibition mechanisms that can optimize nitrogen utilization efficiency in soil-plant systems. Urease, a critical enzyme responsible for urea hydrolysis in soils, plays a pivotal role in nitrogen cycling but often leads to significant nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization when not properly regulated. This study investigates the application of coordination polymers as innovative urease inhibitors in soil-plant systems, focusing on their mechanisms of action, environmental stability, and agricultural implications. Coordination polymers, characterized by their unique structural properties and tunable chemical compositions, offer promising solutions for controlled enzyme inhibition while maintaining soil health and supporting plant growth. The research examines various copper-based coordination polymers and their effectiveness in prolonging urease inhibition compared to conventional chemical stabilizers. Results demonstrate that coordination polymers exhibit superior performance in maintaining enzyme inhibition over extended periods, with minimal adverse effects on beneficial soil microorganisms and plant development. The study also evaluates the impact of these inhibitors on soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics, revealing enhanced nutrient retention and improved fertilizer use efficiency. Furthermore, the investigation explores the relationship between coordination polymer structure and inhibition selectivity, providing insights into the design of next-generation agricultural amendments. These findings contribute to the development of environmentally sustainable approaches to nitrogen management in agricultural systems, offering potential solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining crop productivity.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. R. G. Burns, J. L. DeForest, J. Marxsen, R. L. Sinsabaugh, M. E. Stromberger, and M. D. Wallenstein et al., "Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions," Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 58, pp. 216–234, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009.
2. K. G. Cabugao, C. M. Timm, A. A. Carrell, J. Childs, T.-Y. S. Lu, and D. A. Pelletier et al., "Root and Rhizosphere Bacterial Phosphatase Activity Varies with Tree Species and Soil Phosphorus Availability in Puerto Rico Tropical Forest," Front. Plant Sci., vol. 8, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01834.
3. C. Trasar-Cepeda, M. C. Leirós, and F. Gil-Sotres, "Hydrolytic enzyme activities in agricultural and forest soils. Some implications for their use as indicators of soil quality," Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 2146–2155, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.015.
4. S. M. Mousavi, S. A. Hashemi, S. M. Iman Moezzi, N. Ravan, A. Gholami, and C. W. Lai et al., "Recent Advances in Enzymes for the Bioremediation of Pollutants," Biochem. Res. Int., vol. 2021, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5599204.
5. F. Ding, N. Su, C. Ma, B. Li, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, "Fabrication of two novel two-dimensional copper-based coordination polymers regulated by the 'V'-shaped second auxiliary ligands as high-efficiency urease inhibitors," Inorg. Chem. Commun., vol. 170, p. 113319, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113319.
6. G. Xie, W. Guo, Z. Fang, Z. Duan, X. Lang, D. Liu, G. Mei, Y. Zhai, X. Sun, and X. Lu, "Dual‐Metal Sites Drive Tandem Electrocatalytic CO2 to C2+ Products," Angew. Chem., vol. 136, no. 47, p. e202412568, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ange.202412568.
7. F. Ding, C. Ma, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, "Second auxiliary ligand induced two coppor-based coordination polymers and urease inhibition activity," J. Solid State Chem., vol. 331, pp. 124537–124537, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124537.
8. F. Stanisçuaski and C. R. Carlini, "Plant Ureases and Related Peptides: Understanding Their Entomotoxic Properties," Toxins, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55–67, 2012, doi: 10.3390/toxins4020055.
9. E. Mekonnen, A. Kebede, A. Nigussie, G. Kebede, and M. Tafesse, "Isolation and Characterization of Urease-Producing Soil Bacteria," Int. J. Microbiol., vol. 2021, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8888641.
10. F. Ding, C. Hung, J. K. Whalen, L. Wang, Z. Wei, and L. Zhang et al., "Potential of chemical stabilizers to prolong urease inhibition in the soil–plant system#," J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 384–390, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jpln.202100314.
11. R. Sun, W. Li, C. Hu, and B. Liu, "Long-term urea fertilization alters the composition and increases the abundance of soil ureolytic bacterial communities in an upland soil," FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., vol. 95, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz044.
12. P. K. Strope, K. W. Nickerson, S. D. Harris, and E. N. Moriyama, "Molecular evolution of urea amidolyase and urea carboxylase in fungi," BMC Evol. Biol., vol. 11, no. 1, 2011, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-80.
13. R. Zhao, J. Liu, N. Xu, T. He, J. Meng, and Z. Liu, "Urea hydrolysis in different farmland soils as affected by long-term biochar application," Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.950482.